Federal official assure us that contraction of Ebola by the nurse in Dallas was due to a breach of protocol. But the same article goes on to say they have not yet identified a breach.
If the second statement is true, then the first necessarily must be disingenuous. As a matter of simple logic, there are two ways the nurse could have contracted the disease: (1) breach of protocol, as federal officials would have us believe, or (2) inadequacy of the protocol, which federal officials do not want us to contemplate. I am no medical expert, and I have no idea which of the two possibilities actually accounts for the nurse’s disease. But over 37 years of practicing law has given me what I indelicately refer to as a bullshit meter.
That meter red lines when someone gives me assurances on a matter about which they themselves have admitted they are ignorant. That’s what the federal officials have done here. If they have not identified a protocol that was breached, they cannot possibly know that breach of protocol is the cause. Without identifying a particular breach, they cannot possibly rule out inadequacy of the protocol. They are just telling us what they want us to believe. In so doing, they undermine their credibility at the worst possible time. That is contemptible behavior.